Confirmations scientifiques 10

Confirmations scientifiques10

CP) Billy Meier parle de villes construites dans la mer :

144) Und zu jener Zeit wird es sein, dass der Erdenmensch in den Meeren grosse Städte baut, und sie werden sich alltäglich in den Tiefen der Wasser bewegen und sich von Meeresfrüchten aller Art ernähren.

144) And it will be at that time that the Earth human being builds great cities in the seas and human beings will ordinarily move around in the depths of the water and nourish themselves on all kinds of seafood.

https://au.figu.org/prophecies_predictions.html

 144) Et à cette époque, le terrien construira de grandes villes dans les mers, et il évoluera chaque jour dans les profondeurs aquatiques, en se nourrissant des fruits de mer de toutes sortes.
http://billymeiertraductionsfr.blogspot.com/2015/11/avertissement-de-1958.html

------------------->
Ce n'est plus de la SF mais une réalité probable :
 
Technology has made a lot of things once only seen in sci-fi works of fiction a reality, and now floating cities may join the list. Earlier this month, UN-Habitat, the UN’s Human Settlement Programme, showcased a project for floating villages that could house up to 10,000 people.

    "The biggest question in people's minds is if these cities can actually float," the chief executive officer of Oceanix, Marc Collins Chen, told the BBC.

    "The main obstacles at this point are psychological and are not technological," said another supporter of the project, Richard Wiese, president of The Explorers Club. "People psychologically get nervous at the term 'floating city'. I used this term to my wife, and her immediate response was not technological but rather visceral, she didn't like the idea of something that could drift away."


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-09/self-sufficient-floating-islands-may-soon-become-reality

CQ) Billy Meier évoque l'intelligence et la sensibilité des éléphants :

Billy
Then now, I turn to something else, namely to elephants, since I know that you are well-versed in zoology and, thus, also in the area of wildlife. In reference to elephants, I would just like to know if I still remember Sfath’s instruction correctly, for I was just asked about this. Sfath explained to me that elephants have an extraordinarily advanced instinct-consciousness, as well as a highly advanced instinct-psyche, and as a result of this, an instinct-relationship also exists among their equals and, to a lesser extent, also with other life forms, including humans, if they can directly deal with elephants in a loving way.
The communication of the elephants among themselves takes place in a similar way as with dolphins and whales, etc., whereby at least these two life forms are also predisposed in a very similar way, with respect to instinct-consciousness, instinct-relationship, and instinct-psyche. The elephants communicate among themselves using these forms mentioned, but also through touch, gestures, scents, and sniffing, as well as through audible sounds and infrasound. Is my memory right in this regard?
Quetzal
126. It’s all remarkably accurate.

Billy
Dann komme ich jetzt zu etwas anderem, und zwar auf die Elephanten, da ich weiss, dass du ja in Zoologie und also auch auf dem Gebiet der Fauna bewandert bist. In bezug der Elephanten möchte ich nur wissen, ob ich die Belehrung Sfaths noch richtig in Erinnerung habe, weil ich eben danach gefragt wurde. Sfath erklärte mir, dass die Elephanten über ein aussergewöhnlich hoch entwickeltes Instinktbewusstsein sowie über eine hochentwickelte Instinktpsyche verfügen, woraus auch eine Instinktbeziehung unter ihresgleichen gegeben ist, wie in geringerem Masse auch für andere Lebensformen, wozu auch der Mensch gehört, wenn er sich in liebevoller Weise direkt mit Elephanten beschäftigen kann. Die Verständigung der Elephanten untereinander erfolgt in ähnlicher Weise wie bei den Delphinen und Walfischen usw., wobei zumindest auch diese beiden Lebensformen in sehr ähnlicher Weise hinsichtlich des Instinktbewusstseins, der Instinktbeziehung und der Instinktpsyche veranlagt sind. Die Elephanten verständigen sich also unter sich mit den genannten Formen, wie aber auch durch Berührungen, Gesten, Düfte und Schnuppern sowie durch akustische Laute und durch Infraschall. Ist meine Erinnerung diesbezüglich richtig?
Quetzal
126. Es ist alles von bemerkenswerter Richtigkeit.

http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_214
------------------->

The Science Is In: Elephants Are Even Smarter Than We Realized

...
. Because of recent experiments designed with the elephant’s perspective in mind, scientists now have solid evidence that elephants are just as brilliant as they are big: They are adept tool users and cooperative problem solvers; they are highly empathic, comforting one another when upset; and they probably do have a sense of self.
...
Ed Stewart, president and co-founder of PAWS, thinks that even his massive haven is not adequate to keep the elephants as healthy as they would be in the wild. "Elephants should not be in captivity— period," he says. "It doesn’t matter if it’s a zoo, a circus or a sanctuary. The social structure isn't correct, the space is not right, the climate is not right, the food is not right. You can never do enough to match the wild. They are unbelievably intelligent. With all of that brainpower—to be as limited as they are in captivity—it's a wonder they cope at all. In 20 years I hope we will look back and think, 'Can you believe we ever kept those animals in cages?'"

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-science-is-in-elephants-are-even-smarter-than-we-realized-video/

CR) Ceci n'est pas une corroboration directe mais montre la pertinence des remarques de Billy Meier qui parle de la difficulté de mettre en évidence les trous noirs :

BLACK HOLES
In 1915, as part of his General Theory of Relativity, Albert Einstein already taught that black holes could indeed exist, at least in theory. The descriptive term "Black Hole," however, was only coined in 1967 by the American astronomer John Wheeler. From then on black holes were considered a probability. However, astronomers continued to be skeptical about this theory because, among other reasons, black holes had never been observed due to their characteristic ability to swallow all nearby matter and light.

One very popular theory states that black holes exist at the center of most bright galaxies. This implies that the Milky Way, our galaxy, has one too -- just as the Pleiadians/Plejarans have explained, and as their closing prophecies affirm. They state that in the distant future terrestrials will access the energies from the black hole in our Milky Way, and actually make use of them. Because the view from Earth is somewhat obscured by haze, gas, dust clouds and the like, evidence substantiating the existence of our own galaxy's black hole may be very difficult to ascertain. Perhaps even the Hubble Telescope will lack the capability of observing it and, therefore, we may have to wait for other, greatly improved telescopes or, indeed, we may only find out when the first real ventures into outer space take place.

Billy
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/FIGU_Bulletin_009

------------------->

The image of a dark core encircled by a flame-orange halo of white-hot plasma looks like any number of artists' renderings over the last 30 years.

"I never thought that I would see a real one in my lifetime," said CNRS astrophysicist Jean-Pierre Luminet, author in 1979 of the first digital simulation of a black hole.

https://phys.org/news/2019-04-astronomers-unveil-photo-black-hole.html

La toute première image d'un trou noir vient d'être dévoilée ce mercredi. Huit télescopes répartis à travers le monde en avaient ciblé deux en avril 2017. Qu'est ce que ce phénomène ? En 2003, à l'occasion de la découverte d'un gigantesque trou noir, l'astrophysicien Jean-Pierre Luminet tentait d'y répondre.
...
Si ce phénomène fait l'objet de toutes les fascinations, c'est parce qu'il n'a jamais été photographié mais seulement modélisé. D'après FranceInfo, les scientifiques ont donc cherché à observer le phénomène par contraste, c'est à dire sur la matière qui l'entoure, comme l'expliquait l'astrophysicien Jean-Pierre Luminet en 2003 : "Le trou noir en lui-même est invisible. On ne va pas le détecter directement. En revanche, le trou noir a une manière bien à lui de faire à la fois briller et bouger la matière qu'il y a autour, c'est à dire les étoiles et le gaz. Il les fait briller d'une certaine façon." Jean-Pierre Luminet a d'ailleurs été le premier à simuler numériquement un trou noir en 1979.
https://www.ina.fr/contenus-editoriaux/articles-editoriaux/jean-pierre-luminet-le-trou-noir-est-invisible

CR) Billy Meier affirme que les hommes de l'expédition Franklin sont morts en partie à cause de l'intoxication des boîtes de conserve en plomb et en partie à cause du froid.

Billy
Recently, I was asked for the reason why the so-called Franklin Expedition had failed and why all the participants had died? It was a pole expedition.

Quetzal
189. That is well-known to me.
190. Without exception, the participants of the expedition died as a result of lead poisoning, which was brought about by canned food, for the cans contained high concentrations of lead that poisoned the contents, which were then eaten by the people, by what means they fatally poisoned themselves.
191. And those, who did not die directly from lead poisoning, miserably perished by freezing to death.
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_214

------------------->

 
Des études ont montré des traces de poison dans les os des marins.

The lead content of bones that were surface scattered about a purported campsite of the 1845 Franklin expedition was measured using a fluorescence excitation technique based on a109Cd radioisotope source. The lead concentrations are considerably greater than values observed in modern populations and the ratio of the lead content in the calcaneus to that in the tibia is greater than that observed in subjects currently exposed occupationally. The pattern of distribution of lead between bones indicates excessive intake of lead during the period of the expedition. Predictions of blood lead levels based on the measured bone lead concentrations, suggest that the current upper limit for occupational exposure recommended to prevent neurological changes was exceeded.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440396900424

Une autre étude plus récente affirme que ce pourrait ne pas être un empoisonnement par le plomb mais un expert des empoisonnements fait remarquer qu'il faut nuancer :

Lead poisoning in particular was seen as a major contributor to the sailors’ deaths, who may have been exposed to lead from tin cans and possibly the ships’ water filtration system. And indeed, previous studies did uncover unusually high levels of lead in some of the skeletal remains, but many questions remained unanswered, such as source of the lead and the level and duration of exposure. To complicate matters, lead exposure was common in the 19th century, so while the lead within the skeletal remains seemed high, it’s not known how these levels compared to other sailors in the British navy during the same period.

New research published today in PLOS One delves further into this particular issue, concluding that lead poisoning did not play a pivotal role in the deaths of the Franklin Expedition sailors. To reach this conclusion, a research team from MacEwan University in Edmonton, Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, and several other Canadian institutions examined three hypotheses.

...

Russell Taichman, a professor at the University of Michigan in the Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine and an expert on the various ailments afflicting the members of the Franklin Expedition, told Gizmodo that the new paper was “very well done,” and the “controls were good and the conclusions justified.” Taichman, who wasn’t involved in the study, found it “very interesting” that “lead poisoning was not ubiquitous as a cause of widespread failure,” but he believes the paper presents some findings “which leave more to be done.” For example, he said, “some of the samples had much higher lead levels than others—why? A clear answer is not known. It leaves room for more investigation.”

https://gizmodo.com/doomed-19th-century-arctic-expedition-wasnt-brought-dow-1828632856

On n'a donc pas la certitude sur cette histoire mais on remarquera à quel point l'explication de Billy Meier est nuancée et donne une explication logique à ces découvertes.

CS) Billy Meier affirme que la mort est un processus instantané mais qu'elle ne se produit pas immédiatement dès que le cerveau s'arrête (ce que l'on appelle une mort clinique) : en effet le cerveau serait le siège de mécanismes indétectables et une personne peut rester en vie pendant un certain moment.

When the individual functions of the material body dissolve gradually, then joy and peace manifest themselves as well as true love and an infinite freedom, which allow one to recognize/acknowledge the radiating light of the elementary spiritual realm of the great beyond. 
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Life_And_Death_Are_Inherent_To_Each_Other

In his book ”Wiedergeburt, Leben, Sterben, Tod und Trauer“ [Reincarnation, Life, Dying, Death and Grief; only available in German] Billy Meier explains the difference between clinical death and biological death. Clinical death means that the breathing, heart activity and brain activity are reduced to such an extent that even an EEG cannot pick it up, which is then called zero line EEG. But with that the state of “Tiefst-Agonie” (deepest death throes) has not been reached, which means that the spirit form and the consciousness-block have not yet left the Superior Colliculus and disappeared into their respective realms in the other world; therefore the body can be revived through cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. Biological death, on the other hand, means that a complete and irreversible cessation of brain function has occurred and that the spirit form and the consciousness block have left the Superior Colliculus, which means all body functions cease and the body cannot be revived. ... To help a person die with dignity, we need to create a quiet, peaceful, and harmonious environment within ourselves and around the dying person, because during the dying phase the human being is extremely sensitive and marked by a high-grade “Feinfühligkeit” (fine-sensitivity), through which he/she even perceives stirrings of the feelings that are transmitted from persons standing around. Therefore we need to be extremely careful with our thoughts and feelings and control them well if we are near a dying person. And great care must be taken that wailing, speaking or any other noises are avoided under all circumstances in order not to disturb the peaceful mystery of dying, into which the consciousness of the dying human being enters or has already entered. Billy states that in fact it must be viewed as deliberate cruelty when a human being in the dying state is disturbed by anything or it is attempted to call him/her back into the acute consciousness. Therefore I consider it cruel and in breach of our evolutionary duty to take a brain dead person to theatre to harvest his/her organs. It does not give the dying person the quiet, peace and dignity that he/she deserves and that we owe them out of respect.
http://au.figu.org/organ_donation.html

------------------->


This research revealed some shocking information. It appears that the death of brain cells may not be as sudden, or as irreversible, as previously believed. The cells of the brain remained viable six hours later, compared with other brains not preserved using the newly developed process, the researchers reported. This study revealed a surprising degree of resilience among cells within a brain that has lost its supply of blood and oxygen, Sestan said. “Cell death in the brain occurs across a longer time window than we previously thought,” he explained. “Although the experiments stopped short of restoring consciousness, they raise questions about the ethics of the approach — and, more fundamentally, about the nature of death itself. The current legal and medical definitions of death guide protocols for resuscitating people and for transplanting organs,” the press release states.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-19/zombie-science-researchers-kept-brains-decapitated-pigs-alive-36-hours

CT) Billy Meier affirme que le sport pratiqué de façon exagérée, y compris le jogging est mauvais pour la santé, qu'il peut être dangereux pour les reins et que 20 à 30 minutes de marche quotidienne suffisent . (Contact 371 daté de 2005 publié en 2007)

With regard to all kinds of extreme sports, the stupid and mistaken opinion prevails with the Earth person that the person has to confirm himself through these, by going to the limits of his abilities and strengths. This fallacy also corresponds to a paranoid form, as this also appears with the beauty craze, and inferiority complexes coupled with stupidity and foolishness are also here.
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_371

------------------->

Des études de 2010 et 2017 semblent le confirmer :

A recent study looked at the kidneys of marathon runners before and shortly after they finished a run and found evidence consistent with acute kidney injuries. The drastic steps our bodies take to keep our legs moving over distances results in a flood of chemicals into our bloodstreams, which can overload internal organs already hamstrung by ongoing strenuous activity. It’s not just our kidneys either: dangerously low sodium levels, bloody urine and compromised immune systems are only some of the side effects of a lengthy run.

Temporary Ills
The good news, however, is that we seem to bounce back quickly — the marathoners looked at as part of the kidney study were back to normal within a few days. Chirag Parikh, a professor of medicine at Yale University, and a team of researchers used blood samples to measure kidney health in runners both right before and right after a marathon. They were looking for distinctive biomarkers in the bloodstream that can indicate organ damage, based on the results of a 2010 study, also by Parikh, that found nearly half of the marathoners studied experienced kidney damage. In particular, Parikh wanted to monitor levels of creatinine, which are biomarkers associated with kidney injury.

This time around, his small study, published in the American Journal of Kidney Diseases, found that nearly two-thirds of runners displayed evidence of kidney damage, and that it seemed to peak one day after the marathon. After two days, the runners’ kidneys were progressing back toward normal functionality, and they don’t seem to have experienced any long-term ill effects as a result. Still, the temporary damage could be a more pressing problem for those whose whose kidneys are already weakened, such as people with diabetes, high blood pressure, or the elderly.


http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2017/03/29/running-a-marathon-effects-body/
  
Background:  The impact of marathon running on kidney function has not been previously described.
Methods:  From 425 marathon runners, 13 women and 12 men were randomly selected and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and blood/urine biomarkers were performed 4 weeks before (baseline), immediately after (peak), and 24 h after the race (recovery).
...
Conclusion:  Approximately 40% of marathon runners experience a transient rise in serum creatinine that meets criteria of AKI with a parallel elevation of cystatin C, and supportive elevations of neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin and kidney injury molecule‐1 in the urine. All biomarker elevations resolved by 24 h. These data suggest that AKI with a transient and minor change in renal filtration function occurs with the stress of marathon running. The impact of repetitive episodes of AKI with long‐distance running is unknown.


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01354.x

Background
Investigation into strenuous activity and kidney function has gained interest given increasing marathon participation.

Study Design
Prospective observational study.

Setting & Participants
Runners participating in the 2015 Hartford Marathon.

Predictor
Completing a marathon.

Outcomes
Acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by AKI Network (AKIN) criteria. Stage 1 AKI was defined as 1.5- to 2-fold or 0.3-mg/dL increase in serum creatinine level within 48 hours of day 0 and stage 2 was defined as a more than 2- to 3-fold increase in creatinine level. Microscopy score was defined by the number of granular casts and renal tubular epithelial cells.

Measurements
Samples were collected 24 hours premarathon (day 0), immediately postmarathon (day 1), and 24 hours postmarathon (day 2). Measurements of serum creatinine, creatine kinase, and urine albumin were completed, as well as urine microscopy analysis. 6 injury urine biomarkers (IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, kidney injury molecule 1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and tumor necrosis factor α) and 2 repair urine biomarkers (YKL-40 and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) were measured.

Results
22 marathon runners were included. Mean age was 44 years and 41% were men. 82% of runners developed an increase in creatinine level equivalent to AKIN-defined AKI stages 1 and 2. 73% had microscopy diagnoses of tubular injury. Serum creatinine, urine albumin, and injury and repair biomarker levels peaked on day 1 and were significantly elevated compared to day 0 and day 2. Serum creatine kinase levels continued to significantly increase from day 0 to day 2.

Limitations
Small sample size and limited clinical data available at all time points.

Conclusions
Marathon runners developed AKI and urine sediment diagnostic of tubular injury. An increase in injury and repair biomarker levels suggests structural damage to renal tubules occurring after marathon. The results of our study should be validated in larger cohorts with longer follow-up of kidney function.

https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(17)30536-X/fulltext